Trading More Logging for a Bit of Wilderness?

The Hungry Horse News has reported on our contention that areas to be logged on the Flathead National Forest should not be nearly doubled in trade for a bit of recommended wilderness!

This is what would happen under the Whitefish Range Partnership Agreement and the Flathead is proposing to similarly increase logging areas (the suitable timber base) forest-wide.

If you haven’t already, please send a quick email to Flathead Forest Supervisor Chip Weber at .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address) and tell him you oppose relaxing protections for threatened grizzly bears and threatened lynx in order to increase the suitable timber base - under the Whitefish Range Partnership or elsewhere on the Forest!

F.H. Stoltze Lumber Company, a Whitefish Range partner, sued the Flathead in 1976 when it tried to decrease its suitable timber base to better protect water quality and because “taxpayers couldn’t afford road building costs necessary to cut old growth” that extensively! And now it has partners Montana Wilderness Association and Headwaters Montana saying “all parts of the [Whitefish Range Partnership] Agreement must move forward together,” which is otherwise known as horse trading!

Fish, wildlife and people cannot afford to have the Flathead’s suitable timber base inflated once again and they need more than a handful of roadless lands protected as wilderness!

Again, please email the Flathead Forest Supervisor at .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address) and tell him fish and wildlife need all roadless lands recommended for Wilderness and a reduced suitable timber base to protect critical habitats, not a bunch of horse trading!

This article published on June 30, 2014 • [Permalink]